Freedom of Information

3557 days ago

FCA Hushes Up Reasons why Quindell did not get premium listing but read the reasons…Ooooh er missus

As I expected the FCA has today rejected my Freedom of Information Request to discover why Quindell failed to make it off the AIM Cesspit and onto the main market. But look at its reasoning. Ooooh er missus…

The letter from the FCA Reads:

Freedom of Information: Right to know request

We refer to your request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“the Act”), for information as follows :

“… ALL the reasons for the failed application and hereby under FOI request that you publish or send to me a full copy of the UKLA rejection letter sent to Quindell PLC on or about 11th June 2014”

Your request has now been considered.

---

3565 days ago

Quindell and ALL the reasons for the failure to make it to the Main Market – FOI Update & questions on share sales despite lockins?

Quindell (QPP) has steadfastly refused to give ALL of the reasons why the UKLA refused to allow it to move off the AIM Cesspit – where it belongs – and onto the main market. It cited one clause of the listing rules as being “particularly” to blame but will just not say what all the reasons were. And so I submitted a Freedom of Information request to the FCA weeks ago. That was acknowledged then in a standard way.

I had expected this to be rejected but lo and behold I have just received an update email stating that it is “being considered” and apologising for delay but stating that I would get a decision “shortly.” I still expect a rejection in the end but there must now be a chance that I shall soon be publishing the reasons for the rejection in full. Oh goodie goodie…that will be fun.

Meanwhile 

---

3600 days ago

Quindell Freedom of Information Request made to UKLA regarding failed move to main market

This article on Quindell (QPP) should be self-explanatory. I have this morning made a Freedom of Information Request to the FCA/UKLA regarding the failed attempt by Quindell (QPP) to make it onto the main list and off the AIM Cesspit. The reasons given for the failure in the RNS of 11th June and the AGM Q&A on 19th June 2014 seem to differ. I would like this matter cleared up once and for all and argue that it is in the public interest that it should be.

My request submitted today reads:

---